Roulette Odds Vs Blackjack

Oklahoma Sooners vs Iowa State Cyclones Odds - Saturday December 19 2020. Live betting odds and lines, betting trends, against the spread and over/under trends, injury reports and matchup stats for bettors. The odds in blackjack aren't significantly worse, however, so both games are a good option. Posted by ChasFile at 1:28 PM on September 23, 2004 From watching too many Vegas specials on The Travel Channel, they always claim that blackjack has the lowest house returns.

By Hon. Ion Saliu, Founder of Blackjack Justice

First capture by the WayBack Machine (web.archive.org) May 21, 2020.

Your Honor, I hereby accuse the Order of Casino Sycophants of damaging public deception. They make-believe that the glamorous game of blackjack has a frivolous house edge. Said game with its odds is so attractive to the masses that we can treat it equally to tossing a golden coin.
Our complaint shall prove that the real conditions of the game are far worse than the fake-news promoted, indeed imposed, by the Order of Casinos and their Sycophants.

If you're willing to put in a little work, blackjack offers the best odds. I'm talking about a.5 percent casino edge, depending on which table you're sitting at. (Meaning for every dollar you gamble, you'll lose only half a penny on average.) But to get these ultra-good odds, you have to know what you're doing. Blackjack's house edge can be lowered quite significantly by using the basic blackjack strategy (a chart which tells you the best move statistically in association to the dealer's upcard), whereas roulette relies on pure luck and the house edge cannot be influenced by playing a certain way. Casino Odds vs Sport Betting Odds: Everything You Need to Know.

Let me just say that benign ignorance has been at the heart of the matter. Nobody really knew what the real odds (probability) of blackjack were. Analysts lacked the fundamental elements required by the fundamental formula of probability: favorable cases (over) total possible cases.

Calculating the odds is the sine qua non condition of calculating the house advantage or the edge the casinos have in the game of blackjack. No casino offers a game where they don't have an edge or advantage. It's their bloodline — a legal requirement, as a matter of fact.

The first attempt at calculating the house advantage in blackjack is granted to John Scarne, a non-mathematical man who had the ambition of being the greatest gambling writer in history. Personally, I grant such honor to Blaise Pascal who analyzed a backgammon game. The historical event is known as de Méré Case and it founded a branch of mathematics hence known as theory of probability.

John Scarne rightly figured out that the casino gains an edge in blackjack because of the simultaneous bust — the dealer and the player bust at the same time. However, when the player busts, he/she loses the bet immediately as he/she always plays first. It is possible that the dealer can bust his/her hand (in the same round), but it is too late for the player; they already lost their bet.

John Scarne calculated the odds of dealer's bust to be 28%. If the player played by the same rules as the dealer, the simultaneous bust would be: 0.28 * 0.28 = 7.8%. But since the player is allowed to stand on 16 or less under certain circumstances, our 'mafia' man calculated that the final odds would be around 5.9%. That's the 'physical probability' of casino winning at blackjack.

The casino offers bonuses to the player, however. They pay 3 to 2 for a natural 21 (Ace+Ten in the first 2 hands of the player). They also allow double-down and splitting pairs. At the end of the day, the bj house advantage goes all the way down to that glamorous figure of 0.5%.

Right now, we focus our attention on the raw figure of 5.9%. Based on that figure (and so-called simulations), everybody agreed that the results of blackjack were:

• 48% winning hands for the dealer
• 44% winning hands for the player
• 8% hands end up as pushes (ties).
• 44/92 = 47.8% winning probability for the player

In order to calculate the probability precisely, we must generate all the elements (blackjack hands) in lexicographical order. Nobody even knows how many hands are possible, as their size varies widely: From two cards to 10 cards (for one deck)! When two or more decks are employed, the blackjack hands can go from two cards to 11 cards.

Of course, there is a lot of blackjack software out there! But all that software belongs to the simulation category. That is, the blackjack hands are dealt randomly. Based on the well-known-by-now Ion Saliu's Paradox, random generation does not generate all possible combinations, as some elements repeat. So, we can never calculate the probability precisely based on random generation. If there are 334,490,044 total possible complete hands in blackjack, only 63% will be unique and 37% will be repeats — if we randomly generate 334,490,044 hands.

I had started years ago a blackjack project to generate all possible hands. It was very difficult. I found the project in the year of grace 2009 and also the code to generate sets from a list (last update: 2014). In this case, the list is a 52-line text file with the values of the blackjack cards, from the four 2's to the 16 Tens, to the four Aces. That's a stringent mathematical requirement. The deck of cards must be also ordered lexicographically, if we want to correctly generate all qualified sets in lexicographical order.

I generated blackjack hands as both combinations and arrangements. Then, I opened the output files (text format) and checked as many hands as possible. Yes, computing things are so much better today than just a decade ago. The generating process is significantly faster.

I wrote a special Web page dedicated to the topic of calculating precisely mathematically the bust-odds at blackjack following the Dealer's rules. There are lots of details, plus screenshots of the probability programs:

• Blackjack Dealer Bust: Software to Calculate Probability, Odds, House Edge, Advantage HA.

Keep this new figure in mind: The odds for a blackjack Dealer's bust are at least 33%. The bust probability is calculated by dividing the number of Dealer's busted hands to the total possible blackjack actions.Blackjack actions is a parameter that counts everything: Busted hands, pat hands (17 to 21), blackjack hands, and draws or hits to the first 2-card hands (incomplete hands). The software does NOT print the incomplete bj hands.

How can we apply the new programming to determine the bust odds for the blackjack Player? After heated debates in forums in 2014, I simply modified my software. The hit-stand limits can be set by the user. Initially, it was fixed — the ubiquitous hit all 16 and under, stand on all 17 or greater.

The software user can set the hit-limit to any value. The choices are, obviously, from 12 to 16. I tried, for example, the hit limit to 11 — that is, hit anything 11 or under, stand on anything 12 or higher. Evidently, there is no bust in such situations. That's another proof that my programming is 100% correct.

I believe that setting the hit limit to 14 or 13 reflects pretty closely the bust odds for the Player. That is, stand on 15 or greater (as arrangements):

Or, stand on 14 or greater (as arrangements):

• Now, the house edge goes between something like .3355 * .2248 = 8.3% and something like .3355 * .1978 = 6.6%. It averages out to 7.5%. It is a far cry from the intentionally false house advantage (HA) of .5%, or even .17% (promoted by several crooks)!
• The overwhelming majority of blackjack players lose their bankrolls quickly, because this is NOT a 50-50 game or so much close to that margin.
• And always be mindful that blackjack is strongly sequential: The Dealer always plays the last hand. Otherwise, the casinos would go bankrupt.

Recalculating the raw figures for winning/losing hands, my theory shows:

• 50% winning hands for the dealer
• 41% winning hands for the player
• 9% hands end up as pushes (ties).
• 41/91 = 45% winning probability for the player

Axiomatic ones, who's right and who's wrong? If you have been a frequent visitor of my website, you already know how many hits I've been taken from casino executives, agents, moles, other gambling authors, system developers, vendors, gurus, bishops, saints, etc. Granted, the attacks against yours truly were far more intense earlier (beginning 1998 and ending early 2000's). They realized I wouldn't get intimidated, so they have given up, by and large.

In this year of grace 2019, I came up with a new idea: Let's set at the same table mathematics and reality. The first attacks aginst me went along the lines: 'Mathematics, specifically formulae, have no place in gambling — as it is totally random.' And I've always counterattacked: 'But what is not random, crooked idiots? The entire Universe is ruled by Almighty Randomness, as voided of consciousness as it might be!'

Standard deviation is the watchdog of randomness. Let's see what figures of blackjack odds are right by employing the binomial standard deviation. Then, compare the results to casino gambling reality.

It is time now to apply the most important bonuses the casinos grant to the blackjack players:

• natural 21 pays 3-to-2
• double down pays 2-to-1 (if successful)
• splitting pairs pays 2-to-1 (if successful).

We ignore the current tendency in the gambling industry to pay a natural bj 6-to-5.

The double down success is closely around 60%. The same success rate of 60% occurs in the pair splitting situations.

Next, it is very important to know the probability/odds of appearance for the 3 bonuses above.

• natural 21 occurs in 4.8% of cases, but only when dealing 2 cards to oneself at the beginning of a 52-card deck. We average the odds to 4% for multiple players (4 players and a bj dealer is an average situation in my book). Refresh your memory by reading this popular resource:
  • Calculate Blackjack Probability, Odds: Natural 21, Insurance, Double-Down Hands, Pairs.
• double down hands have an appearance rate of 8%, as first calculated by yours truly. Please read this very popular resource:
  • Calculate Probability of Double-Down Hands.
• splitting pairs hands have an appearance rate of 3%, as first calculated by yours truly. Please read this very popular resource:
  • Calculate Probability of Split Pair Hands.

Axiomatics, we run my probability software widely known as SuperFormula.exe, the function D: Standard Deviation. We run the function twice: First, for the traditional black jack parameters (5.9% odds, 48% winning probability for the player); secondly, for what I consider closer-to-reality blackjack parameters.

We take a common case of playing 100 hands. That is, the blackjack player must cash in the amount needed to play 100 hands at the minimum bet. For example, in the rare case of $10 minimum bet, the player must chip in at least $1000. I can't stress enough the stupidity of players who start with $100.. they lose quickly.. then leave the table.. go to another table and cash in $100.. etc. Vae victis! Poor victims!

WHOA! ON AVERAGE, THE PLAYER WINS 52 BET UNITS AFTER PLAYING 100 HANDS!!! That's a flagrant impossibility in 99.7% to all blackjack players, in all casino situations. You and I will never, ever, see a basic strategy player be ahead $52 after playing 100 hands, at $10 table minimum!

We come back to earth by going with my fundamental blackjack parameter: 45% winning odds for the player.

You, the player, do lose. Still, this is the happiest case calculated by my blackjack-odds software: One deck of cards. Today's PCs are still incapable (at least in the case of this programmer) to calculate for two or more decks of cards. But I experimented with calculable amounts of cards. The rule is very clear: The more cards, the worst the odds get for the player. In other words, the more decks, the worse conditions for the blackjack hopeful! And even worse with multiple players at the table (the common reality)!

Haven't you witnessed this in any casino, at any blackjack table? The overwhelmingly vast majority of players lose their bankroll quickly. They leave the venues almost on their knees. 'How the hell is this possible,' they ask themselves (sometimes loudly). 'Blackjack is supposed to be a 50-50 game.. damn it!'

It ain't such a golden coin game, kokodrilo (royalty-name for big-time gambler)! I'm afraid you were misguided big-time.. you still are. You are mostly cheated by the card-counting crooks, the bedfellows of the casinos in that gambling bedlam! You go by their insane odds and you are guaranteed to win as a matter of fact. Play 100 hands and win $52 at $10 minimum bet. Well, then, ask for a $100 table minimum and make a $500 net. This is the average, but it will be confirmed in any reasonable long run. Not the billions of hands long-run prophesized by the crooks!

Blackjack: Software, Content, Resources, Systems, Basic Strategy, Card Counting

• Blackjack: Basic Strategy, Card Counting, Charts, Tables, Probability, Odds, Software.
• The Best Blackjack Basic Strategy: Free Cards, Charts.
  All three color-coded charts in one file, in the best decision-making sequence: Split Pairs, to Double Down, to Hit or Stand.
• Gambling Mathematics in Blackjack Proves Deception of Card-Counting Systems.
• Probability Software to Analyze Blackjack Streaks: Wins (W+), Losses (L-), Busts, Pushes.
• Best Card Counting Blackjack Systems, Casino Marketing, Gambling Deception, Fraud.
• The Best Blackjack Strategy, System Tested with the Best Blackjack Software.
• Blackjack Insurance Bet Favorable to All Players.
• DownloadSoftware: Casino Gambling, Roulette, Blackjack, Baccarat, Craps.
• Specific software for blackjack, BJ
  ~ BJAQK and Blackjack: Probability and statistical analyses of thousands of blackjack hands from the perspective of a strict blackjack old basic strategy (OBS) player.

| Home | Search | New Writings | Odds, Generator | Contents | Forums | Sitemap |

If you wanted to, you could spend all day ruminating about the concept of what makes something better than something else. Here's a Stanford University page on the philosophy that explains 'value theory' if you're curious about 'what is better.'

Asking if blackjack is better than roulette is a lot like asking what a best-selling beer does for you. Some people will scream it 'tastes great' while others will argue it's 'less filling.' It's pretty subjective. The comparison for blackjack and roulette is a lot similar.

It's all about context, isn't it?

I'm sure the old adage about sauce for gooses and ganders only works for the casino. They don't care where the player loses money as long as everyone is having fun.

Since gambling is best enjoyed as entertainment, comparing blackjack and roulette feels like comparing a 5-course meal to an elite buffet. As long as the food is good in both places, everyone should be happy.

Everyone has his or her own preferences. So, when a beginning gambler is trying to decide between the meal of blackjack or the roulette buffet, they'll have to decide which suits their diet best.

The rules for deciding which game is best in gambling should be simple.

• Where do I consistently lose the most money?
• Where do I enjoy the most wins?
• Am I having fun?

But what is the best way to explain the pros and cons of both games to a beginner?

Imagine taking your kids to the casino on their 21^st birthday. They finally get to enjoy a night with the adults. Here's how I would compare the two games to my kids:

Blackjack Is More Quietly Social Than Roulette

People chat away at blackjack tables, but the conversation is more subdued in my experience. Many players are more relaxed than the folks standing at the roulette tables.

For someone who is taking it all in for the first time, blackjack is a good game where you can explain odds and probabilities. You can't sit there and count cards out loud for a newbie gambler, but you can explain the game patiently.

I've stood next to more than one roulette table where some young guy screamed loudly every time the ball landed in his zone. It's hard to hold a conversation like that.

Other times the casino may be running slow. You can stand at the roulette table and explain the game to someone because there are no other players. The croupiers are efficient and professional.

I've never felt inclined to talk to strangers at a roulette table. I'm more willing to chit with the chatters when seated for blackjack. It feels more intimate.

Blackjack Is Less Likely to Take Your Money

I once watched a guy place substantial bets on five individual numbers. That was his system. His money didn't last long.

You can bet the table limit in blackjack and burn through a small bankroll quickly. But comparatively speaking, blackjack players are more conservative than single-number roulette players.

You're not at the blackjack table to get rich. You're there to play a game that requires skill. Any fool can drop $100 on a single number in roulette.

The player is responsible for his wagers. I've watched people drop a couple thousand dollars on blackjack. I've lost as much as $500 myself.

• 50% winning hands for the dealer
• 41% winning hands for the player
• 9% hands end up as pushes (ties).
• 41/91 = 45% winning probability for the player

Axiomatic ones, who's right and who's wrong? If you have been a frequent visitor of my website, you already know how many hits I've been taken from casino executives, agents, moles, other gambling authors, system developers, vendors, gurus, bishops, saints, etc. Granted, the attacks against yours truly were far more intense earlier (beginning 1998 and ending early 2000's). They realized I wouldn't get intimidated, so they have given up, by and large.

In this year of grace 2019, I came up with a new idea: Let's set at the same table mathematics and reality. The first attacks aginst me went along the lines: 'Mathematics, specifically formulae, have no place in gambling — as it is totally random.' And I've always counterattacked: 'But what is not random, crooked idiots? The entire Universe is ruled by Almighty Randomness, as voided of consciousness as it might be!'

Standard deviation is the watchdog of randomness. Let's see what figures of blackjack odds are right by employing the binomial standard deviation. Then, compare the results to casino gambling reality.

It is time now to apply the most important bonuses the casinos grant to the blackjack players:

• natural 21 pays 3-to-2
• double down pays 2-to-1 (if successful)
• splitting pairs pays 2-to-1 (if successful).

We ignore the current tendency in the gambling industry to pay a natural bj 6-to-5.

The double down success is closely around 60%. The same success rate of 60% occurs in the pair splitting situations.

Next, it is very important to know the probability/odds of appearance for the 3 bonuses above.

• natural 21 occurs in 4.8% of cases, but only when dealing 2 cards to oneself at the beginning of a 52-card deck. We average the odds to 4% for multiple players (4 players and a bj dealer is an average situation in my book). Refresh your memory by reading this popular resource:
  • Calculate Blackjack Probability, Odds: Natural 21, Insurance, Double-Down Hands, Pairs.
• double down hands have an appearance rate of 8%, as first calculated by yours truly. Please read this very popular resource:
  • Calculate Probability of Double-Down Hands.
• splitting pairs hands have an appearance rate of 3%, as first calculated by yours truly. Please read this very popular resource:
  • Calculate Probability of Split Pair Hands.

Axiomatics, we run my probability software widely known as SuperFormula.exe, the function D: Standard Deviation. We run the function twice: First, for the traditional black jack parameters (5.9% odds, 48% winning probability for the player); secondly, for what I consider closer-to-reality blackjack parameters.

We take a common case of playing 100 hands. That is, the blackjack player must cash in the amount needed to play 100 hands at the minimum bet. For example, in the rare case of $10 minimum bet, the player must chip in at least $1000. I can't stress enough the stupidity of players who start with $100.. they lose quickly.. then leave the table.. go to another table and cash in $100.. etc. Vae victis! Poor victims!

WHOA! ON AVERAGE, THE PLAYER WINS 52 BET UNITS AFTER PLAYING 100 HANDS!!! That's a flagrant impossibility in 99.7% to all blackjack players, in all casino situations. You and I will never, ever, see a basic strategy player be ahead $52 after playing 100 hands, at $10 table minimum!

We come back to earth by going with my fundamental blackjack parameter: 45% winning odds for the player.

You, the player, do lose. Still, this is the happiest case calculated by my blackjack-odds software: One deck of cards. Today's PCs are still incapable (at least in the case of this programmer) to calculate for two or more decks of cards. But I experimented with calculable amounts of cards. The rule is very clear: The more cards, the worst the odds get for the player. In other words, the more decks, the worse conditions for the blackjack hopeful! And even worse with multiple players at the table (the common reality)!

Haven't you witnessed this in any casino, at any blackjack table? The overwhelmingly vast majority of players lose their bankroll quickly. They leave the venues almost on their knees. 'How the hell is this possible,' they ask themselves (sometimes loudly). 'Blackjack is supposed to be a 50-50 game.. damn it!'

It ain't such a golden coin game, kokodrilo (royalty-name for big-time gambler)! I'm afraid you were misguided big-time.. you still are. You are mostly cheated by the card-counting crooks, the bedfellows of the casinos in that gambling bedlam! You go by their insane odds and you are guaranteed to win as a matter of fact. Play 100 hands and win $52 at $10 minimum bet. Well, then, ask for a $100 table minimum and make a $500 net. This is the average, but it will be confirmed in any reasonable long run. Not the billions of hands long-run prophesized by the crooks!

Blackjack: Software, Content, Resources, Systems, Basic Strategy, Card Counting

• Blackjack: Basic Strategy, Card Counting, Charts, Tables, Probability, Odds, Software.
• The Best Blackjack Basic Strategy: Free Cards, Charts.
  All three color-coded charts in one file, in the best decision-making sequence: Split Pairs, to Double Down, to Hit or Stand.
• Gambling Mathematics in Blackjack Proves Deception of Card-Counting Systems.
• Probability Software to Analyze Blackjack Streaks: Wins (W+), Losses (L-), Busts, Pushes.
• Best Card Counting Blackjack Systems, Casino Marketing, Gambling Deception, Fraud.
• The Best Blackjack Strategy, System Tested with the Best Blackjack Software.
• Blackjack Insurance Bet Favorable to All Players.
• DownloadSoftware: Casino Gambling, Roulette, Blackjack, Baccarat, Craps.
• Specific software for blackjack, BJ
  ~ BJAQK and Blackjack: Probability and statistical analyses of thousands of blackjack hands from the perspective of a strict blackjack old basic strategy (OBS) player.

| Home | Search | New Writings | Odds, Generator | Contents | Forums | Sitemap |

If you wanted to, you could spend all day ruminating about the concept of what makes something better than something else. Here's a Stanford University page on the philosophy that explains 'value theory' if you're curious about 'what is better.'

Asking if blackjack is better than roulette is a lot like asking what a best-selling beer does for you. Some people will scream it 'tastes great' while others will argue it's 'less filling.' It's pretty subjective. The comparison for blackjack and roulette is a lot similar.

It's all about context, isn't it?

I'm sure the old adage about sauce for gooses and ganders only works for the casino. They don't care where the player loses money as long as everyone is having fun.

Since gambling is best enjoyed as entertainment, comparing blackjack and roulette feels like comparing a 5-course meal to an elite buffet. As long as the food is good in both places, everyone should be happy.

Everyone has his or her own preferences. So, when a beginning gambler is trying to decide between the meal of blackjack or the roulette buffet, they'll have to decide which suits their diet best.

The rules for deciding which game is best in gambling should be simple.

• Where do I consistently lose the most money?
• Where do I enjoy the most wins?
• Am I having fun?

But what is the best way to explain the pros and cons of both games to a beginner?

Imagine taking your kids to the casino on their 21^st birthday. They finally get to enjoy a night with the adults. Here's how I would compare the two games to my kids:

Blackjack Is More Quietly Social Than Roulette

People chat away at blackjack tables, but the conversation is more subdued in my experience. Many players are more relaxed than the folks standing at the roulette tables.

For someone who is taking it all in for the first time, blackjack is a good game where you can explain odds and probabilities. You can't sit there and count cards out loud for a newbie gambler, but you can explain the game patiently.

I've stood next to more than one roulette table where some young guy screamed loudly every time the ball landed in his zone. It's hard to hold a conversation like that.

Other times the casino may be running slow. You can stand at the roulette table and explain the game to someone because there are no other players. The croupiers are efficient and professional.

I've never felt inclined to talk to strangers at a roulette table. I'm more willing to chit with the chatters when seated for blackjack. It feels more intimate.

Blackjack Is Less Likely to Take Your Money

I once watched a guy place substantial bets on five individual numbers. That was his system. His money didn't last long.

You can bet the table limit in blackjack and burn through a small bankroll quickly. But comparatively speaking, blackjack players are more conservative than single-number roulette players.

You're not at the blackjack table to get rich. You're there to play a game that requires skill. Any fool can drop $100 on a single number in roulette.

The player is responsible for his wagers. I've watched people drop a couple thousand dollars on blackjack. I've lost as much as $500 myself.

If you take the time to think about the game, you become more cautious. Deciding whether to split 5s is much harder than deciding not to split 10s. (You should never split either, by the way.)

In roulette, I quickly grow bored with placing all my money in 2-for-1 zones. Sometimes I bet $25 on a single number. I've never won that bet, but it was fun while it lasted.

Roulette Is Designed to Give You an Adrenaline Rush

Cunard queen mary 2 casino. If you want an exciting game, then play roulette or craps. Roulette is easier to understand, so introduce your kid to casino excitement through roulette first.

A seasoned blackjack player may catch on quickly when someone else is running the table. Maybe the guy is only lucky, but he wins a lot of hands. There's a certain quiet excitement in watching someone play so well.

In roulette, if there's a crowd around the table, everyone may give a shout when a person wins a risky bet. The excitement grows as the croupier pushes a stack of chips toward a player.

Although the gameplay in blackjack can proceed faster than a slow roulette table, roulette seems to take less time to resolve. That adrenaline rush can go on for a while when the crowd is hot, and the table is paying.

With enough players betting on the wheel, roulette looks a lot like the way it's shown in the movies. Someone is always getting chips, even if it's not the same player. The crowd loves a winner.

Crowds are drawn to excitement. If people are hanging around a table, there is a reason. I see groups converge on roulette more often than for blackjack. If your newbie gambler likes attention, this may be the game for them.

Players Have More Control Over Risk in Roulette

There are more options in roulette than in blackjack. And unlike blackjack, where the player must wait for cards to be dealt to adjust the risk they take, everything is decided at once in roulette.

The game is entirely passive, but players can choose from a wider variety of options than in blackjack.

How often do you get four or five splits in a single hand of blackjack?

Players who want to throw caution to the winds and challenge the luck gods prefer roulette to blackjack. It's easier to try a different idea every game. In blackjack, the draw of the cards limits the players' choices.

Players can also balance their risk in roulette. Place a low-risk outside bet in a 2-for-1 zone and then place a couple of higher-risk inside bets on 4-number points.

More People Can Play a Roulette Table Than a Blackjack Table

This varies by casino. Some casinos place seats around their roulette tables. Even if you can stand and bet, the seats take up space. Jackpot holland casino eindhoven nl.

Blackjack tables max out at seven players, no matter what. If there is sufficient demand and available staff, the casino will open more blackjack tables.

Roulette Odds Vs Blackjack Real Money

The same is true for roulette. As the day shifts into evening, more people gravitate toward the roulette tables. Only one wheel may have been active in the slow afternoon, but if a casino has extra, they certainly will open up several more in the evening.

Yet, there is usually no specified limit on the number of players for a roulette table. If 12 people can stand around the table and keep their chips separate, that should be okay.

In a busy casino, roulette may be the easier game to get into. Availability always varies by venue, but it's been my experience that even on busy nights there's always room for one more at a roulette table.

And that is where all the yelling and screaming comes from. The bigger the crowd at a table, the more likely they get excited. All they are waiting for is someone to score a nice win.

Conclusion

When comparing the merits of both games, most people start talking about the house edge.

But what is the chance you'll split five times versus scoring a blackjack on a single draw?

There are multiple edges within each game. The chance of the ball landing on any 1 number ranges from 1-in-37 to 1-in-39, depending on the roulette variation you're playing. The chance of the ball landing on either black or red is just under 50%.

Roulette Odds Vs Blackjack Betting

The payoff odds in both games are adjusted to ensure the house makes a profit in the long run. The real question for me has always been about where I think I have a shot at getting my money back.

Roulette Vs Blackjack Odds

That is most often blackjack.

But roulette is a decent fallback game for conservative players who want to take on a little more risk. It's best to set a limit on how much risk you take before you begin placing your chips.

After all, the night is longer for those who must drive home early than for those who drive home as winners.

Roulette Odds Vs Blackjack Poker